Oregon Media Central
or Register Now

Oregonian memo: Many current news teams will 'cease to exist'

The OregonianA memo from Oregonian executive editor Peter Bhatia today outlined a reorganization plan in which many teams of reporters focused on traditional coverage areas will "cease to exist" in favor of two larger teams. A separate group will handle editing and production.

The memo makes reference to the buyout offer made last month and presumes a smaller workforce. It does not mention newsroom layoffs, though previous memos have made that possibility clear.

"We will not abandon our foundation of beat reporting," the memo says, "but beats will be redefined along areas of expertise of most interest to our readers. Some beats will be eliminated because with fewer people we cannot cover everything that we have in the past."

With "some small exceptions," teams on the fourth and fifth floors of the Oregonian building will be dissolved. Those include online, business, photography, news teams, copy desk, features and A&E (O!). Other teams on those floors — sports, Homes & Gardens, FOODday, travel and editorial — will remain separate.

Eliminating these smaller groups does not mean that their corresponding newspaper sections will be eliminated, sources at the paper confirm.

One of the new, larger groups, titled "Local Expertise and Enterprise Reporting," will include 60 to 70 reporters, editors and support staff. Beats will include politics and government, sustainability, business and economy, and arts and culture. This group will also cover breaking news, watchdog and investigative reporting, and narrative storytelling.

The other group of reporters, titled "Community," will cover zoned content (stories focused on, and printed for, specific geographic areas) as well as hyperlocal websites that are in development. But community webpages will not only be geographically specific. "Community more and more also means communities of interest," the memo says, "and hyperlocal topic pages will be a key part of our Web work."

"For most reporters," the memo continues, "beats will still be the primary focus, creating the enterprising journalism we value. With a smaller staff there will be increased expectations of productivity, flexibility and greater responsibility for Web work. Reporters will need to jump in on issues that require our attention more often than has been the case and work different hours as news and Web needs dictate."

The memo also lays out changes to the editing process, a reduced focus on the evening print deadline, an increased emphasis on audience interaction, and the primary differences between print and online. Read the memo in full after the break. Bracketed explanations are ours:

Oct. 7, 2009
TLs [Team Leaders]:

With the buyout offer on the table, we want you to know where we are headed in reorganizing our newsroom operations. This note represents the why and how of where we are going.

We are committed to keeping The Oregonian strong, both in print and online. It is important to understand that publishing a compelling newspaper is absolutely essential, even as we increase our presence on the Web and embrace the tools it offers us. We are committed to the principles and values that have defined print journalism and will not shirk our responsibility to serve as a watchdog on government and the powerful. At the same time, we need to evolve our journalism, embrace the two-way nature of the Web world and be even more responsive to a public that expects more of a conversation with us. We also recognize that print and the Web are different creatures and require different emphases:

Our focus in print:

  • Reveal how power is used, decisions are made and the impact on citizens.
  • Explain how all manner of things really work.
  • Question and explore relevant issues in depth, and explain their substance and context.
  • Introduce people to others worth knowing and to new ideas and innovations.
  • Tell compelling stories of community.

Our focus online:

  • Break news.
  • Encourage, engage and collaborate with communities of interest (both geographic and subject).
  • Serve as the center and catalyst for community conversations (both geographic and subject)
  • Aggregate information in broad swaths across topics and provide information on topics of greatest interest/utility
  • Tell stories with tools unavailable for print.

These distinctions should guide us as we reorganize. We must be a dynamic and flexible local news organization that consistently connects with its audience and addresses its interests with distinct local content.

GENERAL STRUCTURE:

We will achieve what is described above with more efficient and larger work groups. There will be two large groups with reporters and one for editing and production. We need larger work groups to be able to focus our work more quickly and to bring a critical mass of talent to the big stories as they arise. We also need a larger production work group so more work can be shared among a smaller staff. We are separating content generation from production in order to maximize the time and talent of editors on their responsibilities.

Here is an overview, knowing that there is much work still to be done and that this will raise as many or more questions than it will answer. We will answer those questions as quickly as we move forward to the next stages of planning. (More on that below.)

LOCAL EXPERTISE AND ENTERPRISE REPORTING: This group of reporters will be devoted to coverage of local and regional news and features. We will not abandon our foundation of beat reporting, but beats will be redefined along areas of expertise of most interest to our readers. Some beats will be eliminated because with fewer people we cannot cover everything that we have in the past. All will have a metro-wide orientation. Our existing fourth- and fifth-floor teams, with some small exceptions, will cease to exist. Breaking news will reside within this group as well. So will watchdog and investigative reporting. So will narrative storytelling, because we must continue to maintain the craft of feature writing. We are not doing away with coverage of traditional strengths such as politics and government, green/sustainability, business/economy and culture/arts. But this reorganization will push us to redefine beats around the content we need and readers want and be less bound to traditional beats defined primarily by buildings or institutions. This group also needs to think more about opportunities to present information online and will work to differentiate stories that are posted early in the day from what appears in print.

The group will be headed up by Susan [Gage, managing editor for breaking news and online], who will have a team of editors working with her. They will have shared responsibility for working with reporters to produce content for the front page, Metro, How We Live, Business and the Web site on a daily basis. This will require greater coordination, planning and sharing of resources because we expect the content to be distinct and appropriate for newspaper sections or the Web, greater in quantity that we currently produce and of the highest quality. The group will include about 60-70 reporters, editors and support staff.

COMMUNITY: This group will be based both downtown and in bureaus and will be responsible for daily zoned content and hyperlocal community-based Web sites. Staff reporters downtown (for Portland) and in bureaus will be more trend-spotters, focused on producing enterprising zoned centerpieces and less beat-centric. We recognize that a foundation of enterprise comes from sourcing and expertise borne of beat reporting, so finding the right balance with limited resources will be challenging. Going forward, we'll use more interns and freelancers for some street-level kinds of stories. In addition, we are beginning to create hyperlocal sites for all the suburban communities and the city. These sites are critically important and represent much of our future online. Hyperlocal is to newspapers today what zoning was the past 20 years or so. It is a way we remain vital to communities, defined by geography and topic. Community more and more also means communities of interest, not just geography, and hyperlocal topic pages will be a key part of our Web work. To be successful, we must ensure all these Web pages are anchored by Oregonian journalism, as well as full of other news, information and lists. They must serve as a center for community conversations.

The community group, headed by JoLene [Krawczak, managing editor for features], will include staffers assigned to build and manage those pages. It will likely be about 40 reporters and editors, including interns.

EDITING AND PRODUCING: This group represents the nerve center of the newsroom’s editing and play decisions. It is essential that we transition from the traditional mentality and rigid time clock of newspaper production. That is, we need to organize to deal with news as it happens and to get it to the right place, whether online, print, or both. We’ll have more of a round-the-clock focus, rather than strictly aiming our energies toward the evening print deadline. Also, with a smaller staff, we need to separate section editing from story generation so editors working with reporters can focus on that task. We also need to streamline editing operations and simplify newspaper production since we will be losing many copy editors and designers. We must move toward “one-touch editing.” Therefore, all production for all sections will be done in one place.

This new operation will be headed by Therese [Bottomly, managing editor for readership and standards]. She will have a team of section editors working for her who are responsible for prioritizing and producing what goes in the paper and online each day, in consultation with the content editors. In addition, management of the OregonLive home page and other Internet operations will be part of this operation. So will copyediting, design and wire editing. Photo/multimedia/graphics will be part of this group as well. So will Listings. It will likely be about 60-70 people, but that’s the squishiest number of the three as this operation will be the most complex to build out.

For now, Sports, Homes & Gardens, FOODday, Travel and Editorial will remain separate content-generating operations, but production of all those sections and pages would move into the production group. Homes & Gardens, FOODday and Travel will continue to report to JoLene.

####

In this new structure, everyone's job will change either somewhat or a lot:

For most reporters, beats will still be the primary focus, creating the enterprising journalism we value. With a smaller staff there will be increased expectations of productivity, flexibility and greater responsibility for Web work. Reporters will need to jump in on issues that require our attention more often than has been the case and work different hours as news and Web needs dictate. More reporters on their beats will engage in chats online, will "crowdsource" on topics of coverage and engage online with people who have something to offer within their area of expertise. It is worth saying again: Substance and agenda-setting public-service journalism always will be top priorities for us. We need to make sure our work more directly connects with reader needs and interests, while fulfilling expectations that we are acting as their eyes and ears.

For assigning editors, the reorganization means greater focus on the work of reporters (as compared to sections), dedication to enterprise and flexibility. Editors will be charged with helping reporters be successful qualitatively as well as quantitatively and will make sure every reporter has cover-worthy stories under construction at any time. There will be significantly fewer assigning editors. (Some will be reassigned to new duties as we reduce staff.) Editors will (as with the reporters) be both keepers of topic areas and generalists responding to the needs of the day.

For copy editors and designers, reorganization means a less deadline-centric world and working across platforms at all times. It means managing the home page and the site as well as editing copy, writing headlines and designing pages. More work will be shared and workflows streamlined to eliminate redundancies and to free up time for the work that needs the closest attention. Rather than a universal desk, think of it as a creative production operation managing the Web and the paper.

For photojournalists, it means everyone -- editors and photographers -- must be fully trained and able to work in still or video and can flow from one to the other as needs dictate. No one can be just about still photography or just video.

This is just a start. We’ll need and seek your feedback as we begin to build the specific structure in support of these broad ideas.

The key next steps:

  • Set specific work priorities for each of three large groups.
  • Make sure we are in agreement on the primary content areas within the expertise and enterprise group and begin to define beats.
  • Begin to figure out how the production operation will work, what the key leadership jobs will be and how we will integrate home-page management into the function of copy editors and designers.
  • Please bring questions to any of the senior editors.

Comments

Kudos on two fronts

1) The devil is always in the details, but it sounds like an intelligent, thoughtful and well-focused plan for coping with a changing landscape with diminished resources.

2) It's nice to see some stories on the print side make the cut here. There is really no other outlet. We need a local version of Poynter's Romenesko, and this is as close at it gets right now.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Thank you

I would love to have more print stories on OMC. Please send in your tips, folks!

And speaking of Poynter, welcome, Romenesko readers! Welcome, E&P readers, too!

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

A view from the other side of the bridge:

FYI, I was 20 years in newspapers, and have since been three years as a full-time, professional blogger. Before leaving, I tried to help my paper (The Baltimore Sun) transition more quickly -- and more nimbly. Assuming there will be lots of traditional print people reading this post (it is making the rounds) I have copied some thoughts from something I posted on Facebook.
_____

IMO, the problem is not a lack of MoJos and SoJos. It is the print edition, and all of the baggage that entails.

Sure, the print edition is still profitable for some. But it is also the problem. Those revenues are based on the fast-disappearing, moat-based ad rates. There is no moat anymore, except for (necessarily) at newspapers.

The infrastructure required to lock in the news cycle once a day, deliver it with gas and people and trucks, day-old, on dead trees is what makes newspapers noncompetitive.

It requires mass adoption for adequate revenues -- and that will never happen again in a splintered information market.

This is what newspapers should have been doing ten years ago in preparation for what they should be doing now.

For a news org to survive -- and even maybe be very profitable -- it has to embrace the proper infrastructure to match up online ad revs with news production costs.

I'd want to see:

1. No newsroom. MoJos out in the field gathering visuals and words and uploading them real-time.

2. More loosely defined -- or completely redefined -- beats. And a pool of people who could be deployed as needed to various "beats" on a given day.

3. IP address scraping to make every ad buy potentially hyper-local. And scale costs based on how local or desirable that demo is.

4. Embrace a variety of channels (like RSS, Twitter, etc.,) to allow me to configure my exact *pushed* Sun product. I should get to choose what I want pushed to me by section/writer/shooter/keyword/etc.

5. Have news readers (in the newsroom) who convert written stories to .MP3s as they come in, and turn them around to a podcast and/or local AM station to aggregate all of the people in cars. This could be push 3G cell, too.

Newspapers, while claiming to be instituting radical change, are still doing incremental things that are far too little and far too late. Status quo is nothing more than rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

David, nice - voice of

David, nice - voice of experience. But it's a bridge too far. This amount of transformation is incredible, somewhat like asking a General Motors factory to build baby buggies. They're not capable.

But nice, #3 is nice cause the change-up would have to include all parts of the business. The newsroom is probably the most willing to experiment; ad sales need to be both data and habit driven. And if the deal doesn't include handball at the Mac Club, adoption is unlikely.

The net benefit of newsrooms clearing out will be the other entities which use writers / thinkers, non-profits, the arts, campaigns, bureaucracy, middle-management, teaching, parenting. Not so bad.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

pdx- Maybe. But on

pdx-

Maybe. But on newspapers' present arc, they won't make it.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

OregonLive

As the Oregonian grapples with these changes, I sincerely hope someone takes a good, hard look at OregonLive and the way it's organized. Big improvements are needed there to be a useful news website.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Oregon Live, etc.

I agree with the previous commenter that OregonLive.com needs to be wholly reinvented. They should start with the name. Call it Oregonian.com. And have the sections of the paper and the navigation for the site in harmony: the same. No having an 'Entertainment' section online but 'How We Live' and 'A&E' both in print.

I also agree with another commenter that there should be fewer teams and more of an ability for reporters to move from beat to beat as needed per story.

The Oregonian has also got to learn to use an army of freelancer writers and far fewer staff writers. It's ridiculous to pay specialists in certain areas a 40-hour-week salary and benefits to write a couple articles a month.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

The Oregonian

As a former newspaper reporter who has worked in the Web World for the past 9 years, let me say that the Websites for the Newhouse papers (Times-Picayune, Oregonian, Star-Ledger, etc.) are woefully inadequate. This is most likely due to the fact that Newhouse really has never grasped the Web or hired people who could advance their organization's online property in a substantive, meaningful way.

I think the poster named David has good points, especially the one that newspapers should have been thinking 10 years ago how to implement these changes. But I also think his ideals go a little far and are somewhat off kilter.

Newspapers are notorius for being stagnant in the way they do things. I think they have a 30-70 chance of making it in their current incarnation --- even with all the talk of embracing the Web.

I guess time will tell.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

It's Newhouse's fault - not OregonLive's

Just so you know - I interviewed over there, and I know the people at OregoneLive wish with all their heart that their site design/information architecture could change for the better. But the parent company Newhouse as a horrible cookie cutter template that all their web assets must follow.

I've been an Interactive Producer at ESPN and Nike, and yet I was willing to work at such a crappily designed site because they have a great grasp on community engagement, and they are trying as well as they can given the constraints put upon them.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Just so you know - I

Just so you know - I interviewed over there, and I know the people at OregoneLive wish with all their heart that their site design/information architecture could change for the better. But the parent company Newhouse has a horrible cookie cutter template that all their web assets must follow.

I've been an Interactive Producer at ESPN and Nike, and yet I was willing to work at such a crappily designed site because they have a great grasp on community engagement, and they are trying as well as they can given the constraints put upon them.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <blockquote> <img> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readable fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.