October 19, 2020

What different levels of English game are saying about new proposal

ENGLAND TRAIN AHEAD OF NATIONS LEAGUE CLASH WITH BELGIUM

UP NEXT

UP NEXT

Some of the country’s biggest football clubs have come together to outline a secret plan that has rocked football to its core.

Named “Project Big Picture”, owners of Liverpool and Manchester United have proposed the biggest shake-up to the Premier League in years.

It includes a huge wedge of cash injected into the EFL but will also see the League Cup and Community Shield scrapped.

Perhaps the most radical change is that the top clubs would earn around £160m compared to as little as £40m at the bottom

The plan has been branded controversial and unfair to the smaller clubs, displacing and distorting power among the “Top Six” – while some have also praised the ambition shown.

Here, Mirror sport takes a look at what has been said about the proposals.



Rick Parry et al. standing next to a man in a suit and tie: Rick Parry is in support for the new idea


© Action Images
Rick Parry is in support for the new idea

EFL chairman Rick Parry

“It is two of our great clubs showing leadership when it is needed, exercising great responsibility, and from the EFL point of view it is making our clubs sustainable and bridging the gap between the top of the Championship and the bottom of the Premier League.

“The principal part of the story is the biggest reset since the formation of the Premier League which, all being well, will set up the pyramid for the next 25 years. The proposal is designed for the greater good of English football.”

Premier League

“Football has many stakeholders, therefore this work should be carried out through the proper channels enabling all clubs and stakeholders the opportunity to contribute.

“In the Premier League’s view, a number of the individual proposals in the plan…could have a damaging impact on the whole game and we are disappointed to see that Rick Parry, chair of the EFL, has given his on-the-record support.”

Prime Minister’s official spokesman

“It’s clear that this proposal does not command support throughout the Premier League. It is exactly this type of backroom dealing that undermines trust in football governance.

“In terms of support for EFL clubs, we have been given assurances by both the Premier League and the EFL that they have no intention to let any club go bust due to Covid and we know that they have the means to prevent this from happening within their existing mechanisms.

“We would strongly urge the Premier League and the EFL to continue to work constructively to come up with a deal that provides a comprehensive package of scores for the whole football family.”

What are your thoughts on Project Big Picture? Have your say below.

Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport

“We are surprised and disappointed that at a time of crisis, when we have urged the top tiers of professional football to come together and finalise a deal to help lower-league clubs, there appear to be backroom deals being cooked up that would create a closed shop at the very top of the game.”

Football Supporters’ Association

“Once again it appears that big decisions in football are apparently being stitched up behind our backs by billionaire club owners who continue to treat football as their personal fiefdom.

“Football is far more than a business to be carved up; it is part of our communities and our heritage, and football fans are its lifeblood.

“As football’s most important stakeholders, it is crucial that fans are consulted and involved in the game’s decision-making.”

Stoke joint chairman John Coates

“We have long believed that the major long-term issue facing English football is the cliff edge between the Premier League and Championship finances and we are in support of developing any discussions where this is firmly on the agenda.”

Forest Green chairman Dale Vince

“This has got some questionable elements – it’s not perfect but they might just be negotiating points. The bit I’m thinking of is the proposal for six big clubs in the Premier League to dominate the voting.

“If that was done as a simple majority, that would be an improvement on where we are today where it takes 14 out of 20 to pass any rule change.

“I think that is the part that people are railing against as far as I can see.”

Rochdale chief executive David Bottomley

“We have to be very grateful that there is now a plan on the table (for a financial package), and I would like to praise Rick Parry and the EFL for driving this forward.

“I just feel it’s probably going to come at a cost that maybe at this time could have been avoided. I’d agree that perhaps the game does need a complete restructure, but I don’t think now is the time to do that.

“You’re grateful there is something emerging, but tinged with some disappointment that it would appear that there will be a lot of conditions attached, and it has to be voted in – and I’m not quite sure everybody will vote for this.”

Southend chairman Ron Martin

“It appears to me that whilst the principles are agreed between some parties, the detail still needs to be understood and accepted by others.

“Nevertheless, from what we do know it does appear to represent a fairer and sustainable way forward for the football family.”

*Sign up to the Mirror Football email here for the latest news and transfer gossip.

Source Article